Retreat site selection is a key aspect in the study of adaptation, sociality and predation risk in vertebrates (e.g. Campbell and Tobler, 1984; Rasoloharijaona et al., 2003; Rial et al., 2010). The benefits from the thermal qualities of retreat sites are an important aspect for reptiles since body temperature levels influence, among others, rate of digestion, sprint locomotion, predation success and anti-predator tactics (Huey, 1982; Downes and Shine, 1998; Kearney, 2002; Morris and Lattanzio, 2020). Additionally, the effect of temperature on embryo fitness and offspring survival may be dependent on female reptiles selecting optimum location for egg deposition in a thermal context (Löwenborg et al., 2011) or in achieving optimum temperatures by diurnal basking (Lourdais et al., 2004). However, the benefits involve risks. For example, gravid female aspic vipers (Vipera aspis) bask in exposed locations to enhance embryo development through achieving optimum body temperatures but risk predation by predators such as raptors (e.g. Lourdais et al., 2004), and gravid female grass snakes (Natrix natrix) travel to communal egg-laying sites that provide optimum temperatures for embryonic fitness (e.g. Meek, 2017) but risk predation as a consequence of increased movement and exposure (e.g. Bonnet et al., 1999; Meek, 2017). Therefore, costs and benefits of thermal ecology are a critical aspect of reptile life history.

Selection of overnight retreats controls the microclimates that lizards experience when they are inactive, thus enabling them to thermoregulate by subtle movements within retreat areas (e.g. Porter et al. 1973; Hitchcock and McBrayer, 2006). Indeed, Porter et al. (1973) showed that a hypothetical reptile might more easily control body temperatures in overnight retreats than during periods of diurnal activity and may even be capable of maintaining preferred temperatures for longer.

Although retreat site selection in reptiles has been studied previously (e.g. Clark and Gillingham, 1990; Poche et al., 2005; Singhal and Johnson, 2007; Meek, 2008; Cabrera-Guzmán and Reynoso, 2010), data on overnight retreat selection and diurnal movement in relation to retreat site availability, especially in rapidly changing anthropogenic environments, are limited. Given that lizards possess limited dispersal capacities, they are particularly vulnerable to habitat changes. Ecological research efforts are traditionally devoted to natural and semi-natural habitats, but studies on reptiles living in anthropogenic environments can provide insight into the degree of adaptability that has enabled some species, for example A. agama, to be a widespread ecological success, both in terms of population densities and geographical distribution. Additionally, optimal escape theory suggests that the risks and benefits gained from the distances involved in travelling to retreat sites will impact on retreat site selection (Schlesinger and Shine, 1994; Webb et al., 2004; Meek, 2008), and how reptiles respond to anthropogenic environments is important from a conservation perspective.

Agama lizards (family: Agamidae) are a diverse group of tropical reptiles characterized by a great ecological plasticity (e.g. Harris, 1964; Cloudsley-Thompson, 1981) that has enabled some species to survive even in areas outside their native African range (Enge et al., 2004; Leache et al., 2009; Wagner et al., 2009). An example of this ecological plasticity is the rainbow lizard (Agama agama), an agamid that has adapted to life in suburban habitats throughout West Africa (Chapman and Chapman, 1964; Akani et al., 1999, 2011; Leaché et al., 2017) and has been the focus of numerous studies across African regions (e.g. Yeboah, 1982; Anibaldi et al., 1998; Adeoye and Ogunbanwo, 2007) including the Niger Delta of Nigeria (e.g. Akani et al., 2011, 2013). A diurnal species (Cloudsley-Thompson, 1981; Yeboah, 1982; Anibaldi et al., 1998), A. agama on occasion may also be active nocturnally (Pauwels et al., 2004). In the present paper, we investigate the links between retreat site selection and movement ecology of A. agama in urban areas of Rivers State, southern Nigeria. We address the following key questions:

Does A. agama retreat to low-level or elevated perches at night? This question is relevant because agamid lizards have been observed to shift from terrestrial to arboreal habits by night (Cloudsley-Thompson, 1981).

A total of 166 electric panels were surveyed, and 43 of them (34.8 %) were occupied by at least one A. agama lizard. Overall, 435 lizards were observed in overnight retreats: 96 % were observed on cement walls, at an average height of 101.8 ± 86.8 cm (median = 78 cm). Only 4 % of the observed individuals were on a tree/bush within the properties (frequency differences in the use of retreat site location were significantly different, χ2 test, P< 0.0001). On multiple occasions (n= 14), we observed that from around 18:00, lizards started heading towards retreat sites from nearby bushes, fences, and ascended walls and positioned themselves under or on top of warm electrical panels. The panels regulate electrical energy sourced from personal generators or power from national grid and emitted heat. Lizards (n=144, 33.1 %) were observed within 5 cm distance (Fig. 1a), under or on top of these electric panels (Fig. 1b). Most were clustered in groups (Fig. 2): only 1.4 % of the total observed (n= 435) were solitary during nocturnal inactivity (χ2 test, P< 0.0001). When lizards were found in groups, numbers ranged from 2 to 12 and averaged 3.6 ± 2.8 individuals (media n= 3 individuals). Moreover, 92.6 % of the observed individuals were found on vertical substrata and only 7.4 % on horizontal substratum (χ2 test, P< 0.0001). The numbers of lizards were not correlated to the height of the wall when they used electric panels (P>0.05), whereas it was significantly positively correlated when they selected other retreat sites (r=0.765, P<0.001). A heterogeneity of slopes test revealed that the two regressions did not differ significantly (one-way ANCOVA; P>0.05; Fig. 3). Lizards that were located next to electrical panels (mean = 135.5 ± 64.3 cm) were found at significantly higher elevations than those that were not next to panels (mean = 98.9 ± 82.4 cm, the Mann–Whitney U test, w=1418, P=0.0009) with the variances of heights around the means in good agreement (Levene's W=0.001, P=0.98).

Mean substratum temperature was significantly higher at electric panel retreat sites than non-artificially heated areas (F=2.22, P=0.007; Fig. 4) and also when diurnal temperatures were included in the analysis (two-way ANOVA: F=1.763, P=0.023). So they were different in both structure (panels versus no panels) and temperatures (heated areas versus non-heated areas). The frequency distributions of lizard heights on walls next to heat panels and heights of lizards not located on unheated wall areas are given in Fig. 5. Diurnal temperatures were in good agreement for all the different substratum types (F=0.69, P=0.913). Percentage comparisons of temperatures at electric boxes versus temperatures at non-artificially heat areas indicated that 59.3 % of lizards close to the electric boxes could potentially achieve nocturnal PBTs equal to or higher than the known minimum PBT in A agama (≈ 36 ∘C) compared to 7.5 % that were at non-artificially heated localities (z=7.48, P<0.001). The temperatures for both areas in relation to minimum PBT are shown in Fig. 6.

A greater number of adults (males 74 %, females 57.6 %) spent the night close to the electrical panels than juveniles (25 %, n= 25; juveniles versus males, z=3.8,P<0.0001 n=31, juveniles versus females z=2.45, P=0.014, n=33). However, there were no significant differences between males and females (z=1.4, P=0.17 all two-tailed tests). Males (n= 31, mean = 15.6 ± 101 m) travelled greater distances between “late-afternoon core diurnal activity areas” than females (n= 33, mean = 10.1 ± 6.7 m), and both sexes travelled further than juveniles (n= 20, mean = 5.2 ± 41 m; F(2,81)=9.95, P< 0.0001), with Tukey post hoc tests indicating that the differences between each category were significantly different in all groups. Lizards that retreated next to or under electric panels travelled further each day to “late-afternoon core activity areas” than individuals that did not spend the night next to electrical panels (males = 21 ± 15.2 versus 13.7 ± 8.74 m; females = 14.8 ± 7.7 versus 8.5 ± 4.1), but the difference was only significant in females (males, F(1,29)=2.76, P= 0.11; females, F(1,31)=9.06, P= 0.005).

Recorded predation events upon A. agama at the study areas (total n= 66) included domestic cats (n= 21) and the snakes Lamprophis fuliginosus (n= 32), Lamprophis lineatus (n= 7), Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia (n= 5), and Naja melanoleuca (n= 1).

Our study has presented several new findings on the biology of A. agama in the suburban areas of Port Harcourt: (i) most lizards used vertical surfaces for overnight retreats; (ii) most spent the night in groups rather than as solitary individuals; (iii) the lizards used locations on relatively high cement based walls for overnight retreats; (iv) adults preferentially spent the night next to or on electric panels, but this was less evident in juveniles; and (v) there were significant differences between males, females and juveniles in the distances travelled between late-afternoon core activity areas and overnight retreats. In addition, cats and snakes were found to be the main observed predators for A. agama living in suburban environments. However, it is implicit in this study that we did not measure lizard body temperatures since we were careful to avoid disturbing behaviour, which may impact on subsequent behaviour. Nevertheless we are confident that lizards resting on or next to heat panels gained extra heat compared to those lizards that did not and were better capable of achieving or exceeding minimum preferred body temperatures.

There are three possible advantages that elevated retreat sites can confer: (1) reduced risk of predation from terrestrial predators, (2) shelter from rain (Port Harcourt has an extremely wet climate, especially from April to September), and (3) passive basking close to warm electric panels potentially enables lizards to achieve body temperatures within the minimum PBT threshold. Overnight clustering in groups by A. agama contrasts with territorial behaviour in diurnal habitats (e.g. Yeboah, 1982; Madsen and Loman, 1987; Anibaldi et al., 1998) and might suggest that group behaviour is an anti-predatory strategy (Landeau and Terborgh, 1986; Krause et al., 2002; Beauchamp, 2013) or that electrical panels are a limiting resource. This latter hypothesis is unlikely, given that around 65 % of the electric panels were not used by A. agama but were used by geckos (Hemidactylus angulatus), which may possibly be a nocturnal competitor with A. agama. Snakes of the genus Lamprophis and cats are mainly nocturnal foraging predators (for snakes see Akani et al., 2008; Chippaux and Jackson, 2019; for cats see Ogan and Jurek, 1997; Hall et al., 2000). Our observations of predation events support the notion of (i) A. agama constituting an important food source for the mesopredator communities inhabiting suburban Afrotropical areas (Luiselli et al., 2002; Akani et al., 2008; Rodewald and Gehrt, 2014) and that (ii) there should be high risks for diurnal terrestrial activity, especially movement between diurnal home territories and retreats sites. Electrical panel retreats are apparently so valuable that lizards will travel increased distances to access them. We assume there must be benefits gained from these movements and that the benefits outweigh the risks from exposure to predation. Otherwise, we would expect natural selection to work against this behaviour (Lima and Dill, 1990; Fahrig, 2007), which it clearly does not. However, we do not know when the lizards adopted this behaviour and whether there is a long-term selective advantage to retreat site selection. Nevertheless gaining heat from warm overnight retreat sites to elevate body temperatures must increase the capacity for fast movement due to Q10 effects on body temperature (Bennett, 1990) and even reduce early-morning basking costs. Increased movements and greater variation in male movement may involve territoriality, even in respect of overnight retreat sites. For example, males of A. agama are highly territorial and males with higher body temperatures would have an advantage in territory disputes due to Q10 effects on muscular energy. Distances travelled by males were highly variable but significantly greater than travelled by females and subadults. This likely also involves territory defence since this necessitates movement (patrols) to detect the presence of rival males and is well known in other species of lizards including agamids (e.g. Meek and Avery, 2008).

The high percentage of female lizards associated with artificial heat sources could relate to the importance of high and constant body temperatures in increasing offspring fitness and survivorship in reptiles (Shine and Harlow, 1993; Angilletta et al., 2000; Lourdais et al., 2004; Löwenborg et al., 2011; Moor et al., 2020). Laboratory research has shown that elevated levels of basking opportunity and higher night temperatures during late summer in female gecko lizards increased the proportion of births occurring before winter (Moor, et al., 2020). Attaining nocturnally high body temperatures in natural environments, especially when nocturnal temperatures are lower than diurnal temperatures, may be impossible, and hence A. agama is exploiting one of the outcomes of anthropogenic environmental change.

Overnight retreats at elevated locations, for example tree branches, are not exceptional components in the habitats of African agamids and are known to reduce predation risk (Reaney and Whiting, 2003). In central Nigeria, A. agama spend the night in trees and shrubs and on buildings contrasting with terrestrial diurnal activity (Cloudsley-Thompson, 1981). Nocturnal selection for higher perches has also been observed in other tropical lizards, including the chameleon Brookesia decaryi, normally a diurnal ground dweller, that selects higher areas such as small plants, shrubs, dead fallen branches or lianas as nocturnal retreat sites (Razafimahatratra et al., 2008). The selection of electric panels as overnight retreat sites demonstrates a degree of behavioural flexibility in A. agama, including exploitation of the almost permanent “deficiency in public electricity supply” in Port Harcourt city and in Nigeria generally where there is widespread reliance on private generators instead of public electric power (Ado and Josiah, 2015; Nkoro et al., 2019). Despite only a small proportion of lizards being found on trees or bushes, to accurately measure this would require an estimate of how many trees and bushes were available compared to wall area availability, but for logistic reasons this was impossible to measure in the field. Also, it would be necessary to have an estimate of the likelihood to detect a lizard in a tree as opposed to a wall in order to make firm conclusions on the issue of resting site preferences. Thus, given the importance of understanding behaviour and ecology of a highly adaptable species in new and changing environments, a more experimental approach will be applied in a forthcoming phase of our research. For example, increased insight into the heat available to A. agama in its natural environment compared to urban areas will enable understanding of the comparative thermal constraints in each habitat and their impact on the lives of the lizards and how they adapt to urban areas. Such knowledge will be a first step in understanding the conservation measures required to protect A. agama should they be required at a future date.