Journal cover Journal topic
Web Ecology An open-access peer-reviewed journal
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 1.560
IF 5-year value: 1.117
IF 5-year
CiteScore value: 2.3
SNIP value: 0.459
SJR value: 0.41
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 16
Scimago H
Volume 8, issue 1
Web Ecol., 8, 125–134, 2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Web Ecol., 8, 125–134, 2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  20 Nov 2008

20 Nov 2008

Habitat niche community-level analysis of an amphibian assemblage at Lake Nabugabo, Uganda

M. Behangana1 and L. Luiselli2 M. Behangana and L. Luiselli
  • 1Makerere Univ. Inst. of Environment and Natural Resource. P. O. Box 7298, Kampala, Uganda
  • 2Centre of Environmental Studies, Dementa and F. I. Z. V. (Ecology), via Olona 7, 00198 Rome, Italy

Abstract. Community structure was studied across six different habitat types in an amphibian assemblage constituted by 24 species belonging to five families, from Lake Nabugabo, Uganda. We employed a suite of different statistical methods, including univariate, multivariate, and Monte Carlo procedures to investigate the randomness/nonrandomness and the seasonal effects (wet versus dry season) of the community assembly. We calculated for each species in each habitat type an index of relative abundance by using a time constrained counting technique, with 48 1-h counts for each habitat type. Co-occurrence was analysed by C score with 30 000 simulations; resource partitioning patterns by RA2 and RA3 algorithms with 30 000 simulations; and apparent dissimilarity among species in terms of habitat use by UPGMA dendrograms. After pooling data from wet and dry seasons, it resulted that the amphibian community was non-randomly assembled according to C-score analyses, but both RA2 and RA3 were unable to uncover any competitive structure for the dataset. Seasonal effects were evident, and although C score analyses confirmed a nonrandom structure for the community under study (particularly in wet season), RA3 showed that species with high relative abundance tended to significantly concentrate in one habitat type (swamp forest) rather than to partition the habitat resource. UPGMA dendrograms grouped the species differently in dry versus wet seasons. Overall, the comparative evidence of 1) non-random community structure according to C-score analysis, and 2) absence of resource partitioning according to niche overlap null models analysis, suggests that community organization in Lake Nabugabo amphibians is generated by habitat affinities rather than by interspecific competition.

Publications Copernicus