49 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Distribution and composition of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities across the plantation forest cycle—Implications for management M. Karen et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.005
2. Low impact of forest conversion on biodiversity: Evidence from small mammals in contrasting forests of Mt. Liangshan X. He et al. 10.1002/ecs2.4570
3. Fish assemblage compositions after implementation of the IndVal method on the Narew River system T. Penczak 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.005
4. Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle T. Magura et al. 10.1023/A:1021289509500
5. Diversity of click beetles in managed nonnative coniferous and native beech stands: Consequences of changes in the structural and species composition of tree stands in Central Europe V. Zumr et al. 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100057
6. Carabid beetles among grassland — forest edge — beech forest habitats in Northern Hungary Z. Elek & B. Tóthmérész 10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.2.9
7. Effects of forest management on ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in Central Europe are mainly mediated by changes in forest structure M. Lange et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.012
8. Six groups of ground-dwelling arthropods show different diversity responses along elevational gradients in the Swiss Alps J. Gilgado et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0271831
9. Distribution of carabid beetles among 40-year-old regenerating plantations and 100-year-old naturally regenerated forests in Southwestern China X. Yu et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.019
10. Conifer introductions decrease richness and alter composition of litter-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) in Carpathian oak forests M. Wiezik et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.013
11. Rapid recovery of the beetle richness‐elevation relationship and its environmental correlates after a major volcanic event in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina F. Baudino et al. 10.1111/icad.12395
12. Assessing patterns of co-occurrence and nestedness of arthropod assemblages in an artificial–natural Mediterranean forest mosaic (Isopoda Oniscidea, Coleoptera Carabidae) F. Baini et al. 10.1007/s12210-014-0302-4
13. Distribution of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Across a Forest-Grassland Ecotone in Southwestern China X. Yu et al. 10.1093/ee/36.2.348
14. Trait-Specific Responses of Carabid Beetle Diversity and Composition in Pinus densiflora Forests Compared to Broad-Leaved Deciduous Forests in a Temperate Region J. Jung & J. Lee 10.3390/d12070275
15. Carabids of differently aged reforested pinewoods and a natural pine forest in a historically modified landscape A. Taboada et al. 10.1016/j.baae.2007.01.004
16. Recovery of ground-dwelling assemblages during reforestation with native oak depends on the mobility and feeding habits of the species T. Magura et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.12.015
17. Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity is higher in narrow hedges composed of a native compared to non‐native trees in a Danish agricultural landscape G. Lövei et al. 10.1111/icad.12210
18. Distribution of carabid beetles among regenerating and natural forest types in Southwestern China X. Yu et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.043
19. The Bioindication Evaluation of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Three Forest Biotopes in the Southern Part of Central Slovakia V. Langraf et al. 10.2478/eko-2019-0003
20. Trapping liquids may bias the results of beetle diversity assessment O. Nakládal et al. 10.7717/peerj.16531
21. Ground beetle assemblages inhabiting various age classes of Norway spruce stands in north-eastern Poland M. Nietupski et al. 10.7717/peerj.16502
22. Evaluation of mature conifer plantations as secondary habitat for epigeic forest arthropods (Coleoptera: Carabidae; Araneae) O. Finch 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.071
23. Beetle abundance–environment relationships at the Subantarctic–Patagonian transition zone A. RUGGIERO et al. 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00045.x
24. Diversity patterns of ground beetles and understory vegetation in mature, secondary, and plantation forest regions of temperate northernChina Y. Zou et al. 10.1002/ece3.1367
25. Arthropod assemblages in Norway spruce monocultures during a forest cycle – A multi-taxa approach L. Purchart et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.012
26. Changes of isopod assemblages along an urban–suburban–rural gradient in Hungary E. Hornung et al. 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.01.001
27. Effects of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation G. du Bus de Warnaffe & P. Lebrun 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.015
28. Non-native and native tree species plantations and seasonality could have substantial impacts on the diversity of indigenous soil fauna in a semi-arid forest ecosystem M. Karamian et al. 10.1007/s10661-023-11873-8
29. Management Intensity and Forest Successional Stages as Significant Determinants of Small Mammal Communities in a Lowland Floodplain Forest J. Suchomel et al. 10.3390/f11121320
30. Monoculture and mixture-planting of non-native Douglas fir alters species composition, but promotes the diversity of ground beetles in a temperate forest system P. Kriegel et al. 10.1007/s10531-021-02155-1
31. Local climate mediates spatial and temporal variation in carabid beetle communities in three forests in Mount Odaesan, Korea Y. PARK et al. 10.1111/een.12370
32. Spiders in mofette fields—Survival of the toughest in natural carbon dioxide springs? B. Balkenhol et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.032
33. Distribution of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Across Ecotones Between Regenerating and Mature Forests in Southwestern China X. Yu et al. 10.1603/022.038.0412
34. Edge effects on ground-dwelling beetles (Carabidae and Staphylinidae) in oak forest-forest edge-grassland habitats in Hungary B. TÓTHMÉRÉSZ et al. 10.14411/eje.2014.091
35. Large‐scale α‐diversity patterns in plants and ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) indicate a high biodiversity conservation value of China's restored temperate forest landscapes Y. Zou et al. 10.1111/ddi.12964
36. Small stream floodplains have high conservation value for riparian carabid beetles but less for ground‐dwelling spiders P. Bauspiess et al. 10.1111/icad.12759
37. Forest management effects on carabid beetle communities in coniferous and broadleaved forests: implications for conservation R. FULLER et al. 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00032.x
38. Distribution of millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) along a forest interior – forest edge – grassland habitat complex D. Bogyó et al. 10.3897/zookeys.510.8657
39. Importance of closed landfills as green space in urbanized areas: ecological assessment using carabid beetles Y. Do et al. 10.1007/s11355-013-0223-x
40. Influence of Climate and Local Habitat Characteristics on Carabid Beetle Abundance and Diversity in Northern Chinese Steppes N. Tsafack et al. 10.3390/insects11010019
41. Plant and carabid beetle species diversity in relation to forest type and structural heterogeneity Á. Taboada et al. 10.1007/s10342-008-0245-3
42. Millipede (Diplopoda) assemblages alter drastically by urbanisation D. Bogyó et al. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.014
43. To what extent can management variables explain species assemblages? A study of carabid beetles in forests G. Warnaffe & M. Dufrêne 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03880.x
44. Forest edge and carabid diversity in a Carpathian beech forest I. Máthé 10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.1.9
45. Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in the city of Debrecen, Hungary T. Magura et al. 10.1007/s10980-005-1128-4
46. Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation T. Magura et al. 10.1007/s10531-004-7307-8
47. Ground beetle assemblages in Beijing’s new mountain forests E. Warren-Thomas et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.022
48. Effects of some ecological variables on carabid communities in native and non native forests in the Ibaizabal basin (Basque Country: Spain) A. Martínez et al. 10.1051/forest/2009003
49. Effects of reforestation with Quercus species on selected arthropod assemblages (Isopoda Oniscidea, Chilopoda, Coleoptera Carabidae) in a Mediterranean area F. Baini et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.042