Articles | Volume 23, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/we-23-131-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/we-23-131-2023
Editorial
 | 
17 Nov 2023
Editorial |  | 17 Nov 2023

Editorial: Pay to criticise? Rebuttal articles in open-access journals should be published for free

Daniel Montesinos

Viewed

Total article views: 1,333 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,212 106 15 1,333 16 13
  • HTML: 1,212
  • PDF: 106
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 1,333
  • BibTeX: 16
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,290 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,290 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Jun 2024
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Rebuttal articles are always unpleasant to write and, for open-access journals, they might also involve costly article processing charges (APCs). Presently, authors willing to unveil critical flaws in published research might not be able to overcome the added burdens of cost, time, confrontation risks, and small professional gain. APCs of critical articles should be waived by default.