Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/we-14-23-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
AGORA: Ideas and Concepts
| 
24 Jun 2014
AGORA: Ideas and Concepts |
| 24 Jun 2014
Meta-analyses and the "editorial love of controversy"
Related authors
Web Ecol., 18, 15–27, 2018
Related subject area
Theoretical Ecology
Cited articles
Arnqvist, G.: Editorial rejects? Novelty, schnovelty!, Trends Ecol. Evol., 28, 448–449, 2013.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., and Rothstein, H. R.: Introduction to meta-analysis, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 387 pp., 2011.
Csada, R. D., James, P. C., and Espie, R. H. M.: The "file drawer problem" of non-significant results: Does it apply to biological research?, Oikos, 76, 591–593, 1996.
de Winter, J. and Happee, R.: Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective, PLoS ONE, 8, e66463, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066463, 2013.
Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A.-W., Cronin, E., Decullier, E., Easterbrook, P. J., Von Elm, E., and Gamble, C.: Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias, PLoS ONE, 3, e3081, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081, 2008.
